Monday, June 5, 2023

Magic, the riddle of reality

See in Kindle
Magic could be how people do transactions with nature, with tangible results or not depending on the point of view; but even if that’s its immediate objective, its basic function could be more intricate in the deepness of reality determinations. At the end, reality may be a mere convention itself, of which humanity makes its own sense as objective; so it’s natural that a relationship with so bizarre and weird object is equally bizarre and weird.

Besides all that, the core value of magic could be that relationship itself rather than its objective, as proper of reality; which involve both —the human being and its objective— as a nature, in that weirdness. By the way, being proper of the subject —not the object— this objective would be then subjective; as part of that weirdness of reality, which involves all of them in its own bizarre nature.’

As complicated as this may sound, it doesn’t mean that reality doesn’t have consistency, just objectivity by its own; like a very fluid interconnectedness, in which each part creates its own determination of the whole. So everything ends here as an structure, with blurred borders between its functions, that in some cases overlaps; explaining the struggles to concert the different forms in which reality express itself, as the tough mission of science.

Download on Drive
As illustration, the apparent contradictions between general relativity and quantum and classic physics in  science; as anyway this weirdness could mean —weirder yet— that culture may determine reality back too. All of this creates an interaction, in which object and subject exchanges determinations in both directions; and this last being the most certain reality the subject interacts with, in a beautiful scale of states of its own consistency.

That being said, magic could be the way the human being could reflect its own existence, from reality as a nature; making sense of all that weirdness progressively, as an understanding of its ontology. That’s nothing that can be done straight (rationally) and without mistakes, like the pretentions of philosophy; that costing some millennia to humanity, is barely an instant in terms of cosmos, as reality in the development of a nature.

This doesn’t means that philosophy —and science at its center— is a mistake, but leads to mistakes in its excesses; like that specializations it prompted in philosophy itself, distorting the perception of reality with its pretentions. In all this, even if the human is the center of humanity, it’s still insignificant in the whole structure of reality; being only the crown of creation as creation is that subjective objective of human reality, with God as its first representation.

See in Kindle
This would mean that reality should be something deeper and more complex than its physical nature, a hypostasis; in a process of overlapping determination as super imposed states, ultimately expressed on that physical. That’s of course deeper yet, since this physical nature would be just another state of reality; which only the egocentrism —of this relationship with reality— could understand as ultimate, and not just another intermediate state.

If humanity were mature enough to don’t suicide systematically with greed for power, could understand this weird deepness; for which even death would be just a transition, in even a more rational way than the gross dualism of Idealism. But let’s be clear, humanity is not that mature and it effectively kills itself in that greed for power; which makes sense, since more or less is power what makes a possibility of life in nature, even in culture as an artificial nature; but power is then an useful property of the object, not of the subject, and less still the object itself, explaining the problems of this greed.

Morals aside, that was the problem that led to the development of philosophy, which is not a sad thing as a principle; but making those excesses of political distortions, that jus retard the other progression of knowledge and spirituality. Not that it’s avoidable, as a natural derivation of the own development of reality; leading after all to this better understanding of the physical, with all that bizarre weirdness of quantum entanglement; not only as first determinations of reality, but the whole riddle on the magic in which humanity can understand it.

After all, the only reason we know this is because we have complete the round of Pi, as the more than three millennia of physical knowledge; on which that separate reality of knowledge itself grows enough to create its own references, upon which generated its own re-determinations. The reference to Pi is as the mathematical constant that regulates the growth of (any) reality; with the limit of the three times the original body as a critical mass, from which that original body start its own redeterminations.


No comments:

Post a Comment