In this sense, and beyond
its historical references, Haitian political tradition and culture is hard broken
in its periods; without a connection between these, allowing the consolidation
of any residual tradition, to be used as a reference. The first problem here is
in the French pressure, posing the economic debt that prevents this
organization; not only in that conflict of the nineteenth century, but also in
the present, with the American interests, throughout the twentieth century.
It should be remembered the creation of the Haitian central bank, transferring the debt to the United States; and the occupation of the country for two decades, creating the imbalance that conditions any attempt at restructuring. In this context, Duvalier's rise to power —like that of Batista in Cuba— responds to this structural deficit; which is of a sufficient political tradition, and dates to the destabilization caused by the Petion-Boyer’s republic.
Strangely, this is what
explains the ascendancy of mysticism, as a substitute for an organized
political culture; which, not being able to establish itself, subsists in that
perpetual —and certainly brutal—contraction of religious functionalism. This is
what the monarchism of Dessalines and Christopher meant, legitimizing itself as
a revolutionary mysticism; from that Boukman's proclamation to the Bondye, in
which the revolution began, to Louverture's struggle with the French recalcitrance.
The answer to the Haitian
political problem is thus anthropological, because the problem is first anthropological;
emerged from the great crisis that was the French Revolution, as an
anthropological disaster of West culture. This does not mean that the
alternative to Haiti's political deficiency is Duvalier's violence, but only
that it’s deficiency; and its solution would be an emergent development, by
which these contradictions are appeased, in a national reconciliation; allowing
the weaving —as anthropologic— of economic relations at popular level, no corporate
and less still of foreign.
No one will ever want to
accept this premise, because of the idealistic faith that keeps the whole West
in crisis; not just Haiti, which is only the place that lacks a sufficient
tradition to assimilate and consume that disaster; but to the entire West,
converging in the transitive —even racial— tension, that begins in Haiti and
culminates in Cuba. Haiti is then only the extreme expression of that crisis,
which by its dimensions resembles the Minoan cataclysm; now reproduced as
culture, thus preventing its recovery, as that of Phoenician commerce on Mycenean
population.